By Jim Clark
A number of concerns and complaints that have been voiced by Somerville residents over the updated snow shoveling policies announced by the city last month has compelled members of the Board of Aldermen to conduct a public hearing to solicit feedback and suggestions from the public.
Speaking in favor of the hearing, Alderman at Large Mary Jo Rossetti said at last week’s regular meeting of the Board, “The majority of communications I’ve received – and I’ve actually called and spoke with most of these people – after explaining to them further some of the assumptions. After I spoke with them they seemed somewhat satisfied. The remaining tone was the time frame. The 10 o’clock in the morning time frame may be a bit too harsh. And I must say as one member now, I do agree.”
According to the new policies, property owners are responsible for shoveling sidewalks abutting their property of snow and ice. To further ensure that sidewalks remain accessible for all residents, particularly senior citizens, residents with disabilities, and young children walking to and from schools, the city has updated its allowable timeline in which property owners must shovel sidewalks before incurring fines. The new schedule is: If snow ceases to fall after sunrise (during daylight hours), property owners must shovel sidewalks by 10 p.m. If snow ceases to fall after sunset (overnight), property owners must shovel sidewalks by 10 a.m.
In the opinion of many Somerville residents, this timeline is unfair and impractical.
Ward 2 Alderman Maryann Heuston added her support to the reevaluation plan saying, “I think we need to think not just about the time, but I think we need to think about fines and commercial versus residential. I’ve always said on this Board, places tha are commercial establishments can afford to, and should be able to afford hiring somebody to clear their sidewalks. They should be held to a standard.”
Ward 5 Alderman Mark Niedergang likewise expressed interest in adjusting the snow removal policy. “One thought that’s occurred to me is that instead of having it be a 10 o’clock deadline in the morning, which is after all after when most people go to work and after when school is. If you had it at noon, that would give people a couple of extra hours. I don’t see what you would lose. And for folks who are really pressed for time that might be helpful.”
Co-sponsor of the order, Alderman at Large Dennis Sullivan added, “I know that the intent is good. I know that we’ve had problems in the past. But we have to tweak it. We’re in a working city. People work in different shifts. It’s just impossible to abide by this.”
The matter will be further discussed at the Board’s Legislative Matters Committee meeting on Thursday, January 15, in the Committee Room, City Hall.
Reader Comments