Pages
Stay In Touch
More
© 2021 The Somerville Times. All rights reserved.
(The opinions and views expressed in the commentaries and letters to the Editor of The Somerville Times belong solely to the authors and do not reflect the views or opinions of The Somerville Times, its staff or publishers)
By Jason Mackey
“Massachusetts politics is a funny thing. The Commonwealth is full of vibrant debates, clashes of ideologies, and sometimes, surprising paradoxes. A particularly glaring paradox today centers on the Massachusetts House of Representatives, specifically, two self-proclaimed Democratic Socialists: Somerville Representatives Erika Uyterhoeven and Mike Connolly.
Erika Uyterhoeven, State Representative for the 27th Middlesex district, has earned a reputation of refusing to collaborate with her colleagues at the State House. Despite being elected to represent and serve her constituent’s best interest, Uyterhoeven seemingly chooses to prioritize her ideological purity over productive collaboration. This mindset runs counter to the core essence of politics: compromise, negotiation, and teamwork.
In my 2022 campaign challenging Uyterhoeven, I emphasized the importance of collaboration. Despite our political disagreements, the ability to work with others, even those with opposing viewpoints, is vital to effective governance. It is the basis for progress and an essential aspect of serving the best interests of the people.
In stark contrast to Uyterhoeven’s approach, we have Mike Connolly, the Representative for the 26th Middlesex district, who is facing the threat of expulsion from the Boston chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) precisely for working with his colleagues at the State House. Despite Connolly’s self-identification as a socialist and his progressive track record, the DSA is considering ousting him. His crime? Collaborating with other politicians and supporting proposals not radical enough for the DSA. This situation can only be described as high comedy.
Uyterhoeven’s reluctance to work with her colleagues and the DSA’s charges against Connolly for doing just that reflects an inherent paradoxical absurdity within the ideology of Democratic Socialism: get penalized for refusing to work with colleagues or face expulsion for doing so.
As a former candidate for State Representative, I firmly believe that the ability to collaborate with others, regardless of ideological differences, is a crucial quality for any politician. Effective governance requires negotiation, compromise, and mutual respect. It’s not about winning a contest of ideological purity but about making real, positive changes for the constituents you serve.
The divergent paths of Representatives Uyterhoeven and Connolly highlight a key issue in Democratic Socialism: its inability to prioritize practical solutions over ideological purity. They are failing the constituents they claim to represent. The ongoing comedy of the DSA versus Connolly underscores the need for representatives who focus on solving real problems through collaboration, rather than engaging in self-limiting ideological battles. I commend Connolly for his actions and wish Uyterhoeven would borrow a page from his playbook. Without a shift towards pragmatic strategies, the DSA runs the risk of exposing itself as the political farce it is.
If you found this article of interest, please consider sharing it.
Embarrassing article from an embarrassing former state rep candidate. Jason, a venture capitalist, says all the right buzz words – collaboration, teamwork, respect – but has little to no substance in his political stances or in the claims he makes in this article. There’s a reason Jason lost his election to Rep. Uyterhoeven by a margin of 86% vs 14%. Where is the evidence that Uyterhoeven refuses to work with colleagues and has a bad reputation? Or did you just make that up? Jason has no real connection to Connolly and his values either, but of course he’ll take this opportunity to dunk on his former opponent and on DSA in general, which he evidently regards with disgust. Maybe he hates DSA members because they helped defeat him by such substantial margins. Or maybe this venture capitalist simply lacks any real progressive values and policy proposals, needing to make a career off of useful buzzwords and mud-slinging in the MA political climate instead. You can respect both Reps Connolly and Uyterhoeven regardless of your opinion on the democratically proposed expulsion for Connolly; however, this article lacks substance and misrepresents the charges brought by DSA members against Connolly. Do better Jason, and take a page out of the progressive and socialist books of Connolly and Uyterhoeven, who are actually involved in progressive change in the state.
The DSA is determined to undermine itself every chance it gets with unmeetable purity standards and eternal struggle sessions.
Socialism has historically proven to be a miserable joke, and its activity in contemporary US politics is no exception.
Haha. Tell the Swedes and several other nations that joke. They love a good laugh.
Hi! I’m only posting here to note that the “Frank” who posted above is NOT me. Many people know me as Mike’s campaign treasurer, and “Frank” is not that common of a name, so I didn’t want there to be any confusion. That said, I agree with the other Frank that Connolly and Uyterhoeven are great representatives for their respective districts. 🙂