Somerville Mayor Joseph A. Curtatone and Cambridge City Manager Richard C. Rossi released the following statement today regarding the Green Line Extension:
Today the Cities of Somerville and Cambridge Massachusetts are pleased to make this important announcement of our continued support for and commitment of new funds to bridge the funding gap that will allow the construction of the Green Line Extension Project (GLX) to move forward.
It is our understanding that MassDOT has completed its review of the GLX and developed a new cost estimate, and that on Monday, May 9, MassDOT will transmit information for review and evaluation by the MBTA Fiscal and Management Control Board (FMCB) and the Massachusetts Department of Transportation Board of Directors that includes a revised budget and plans and a statement of need for municipal governments hosting the GLX to contribute funding. Based on that understanding, we are prepared to make a recommendation that our municipalities assist the state in the funding solution for this project.
We would like to thank the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the interim design team for their swift but careful scrutiny of the project plans and budget, their commitment to the inclusion of public and municipal feedback, and their diligence in developing a new strategy for moving forward. Should the FMCB approve their expected recommendation to construct the GLX, residents of the Commonwealth will reap the benefits of the team’s critical effort for decades to come.
It is our understanding, however, that without firm financial commitments from our municipalities that the GLX could be canceled and the Commonwealth would forfeit not only its $996 million federal New Starts grant award, but an estimated $700 million in “sunk costs” of the state’s $996 million share of the project. Additionally, the fulfillment of the public needs that this project was designed to meet would remain unrealized.
The purpose of the GLX is to improve regional air quality as required by legally binding resolutions, reduce roadway congestion, encourage sustainable economic growth, and provide a convenient means of public transportation for Massachusetts residents, workers and visitors. To ensure that these needs and goals do not go unmet, the cities of Cambridge and Somerville intend to seek to expand their financial partnership with the Commonwealth to construct elements of the GLX program, subject to and contingent upon approval by the Cambridge City Council and the Somerville Board of Aldermen.
It should be noted that both the cities of Cambridge and Somerville have previously invested significant funds and resources in sunken costs in support of the GLX project, including the City of Somerville’s investment of more than $8 million for land acquisition and other infrastructure, that have relieved the Commonwealth of several specific required project costs. Similarly, the developers of the North Point area are investing tens of millions of dollars in improvements that support and enable the GLX to occur. Expanding this financial partnership is an extreme and unprecedented arrangement for a state infrastructure project. Despite the fact that our cities bear no responsibility for the cost overruns that brought the GLX to this moment of crisis, we will seek to support the Commonwealth by expanding our cost-sharing role. The Green Line is that important to our communities, our region, and our state.
It is our understanding that the new cost estimate for the GLX will retain core program elements including seven light rail transit stations including a spur to Union Square, a Vehicle Maintenance Facility, a Community Path, and related utility upgrades. With that clear understanding, it is our intention as Mayor of the City of Somerville and City Manager of Cambridge to recommend to the Somerville Board of Aldermen and the Cambridge City Council that our cities commit to underwriting project costs for specific, tangible elements that would deliver meaningful public safety and quality-of-life benefits for our residents.
After discussions with the state, the needed value of new financial participation in the GLX for the City of Somerville is projected to be $50 million and the value of the City of Cambridge’s contribution is projected at $25 million, including financial contributions from the North Point developers, to close the funding gap. Again, any contribution will be subject to Board and City Council approvals.
Furthermore, it is our intention to work, alongside MAPC, with Governor Baker’s administration and the cities’ state and federal delegations to seek legislative action on new and refined “value capture” tools capable of supporting new infrastructure investments around Massachusetts. In addition, we request that the Commonwealth establish a baseline tracking framework for future Infrastructure Investment Incentive (I-Cubed) state tax revenue accruals generated by transit-oriented development around the GLX, so as to not preclude a formal application to use eligible I-Cubed revenues to offset Cambridge’s and Somerville’s proposed municipal contribution, if they choose that option.
It is clear that the Commonwealth is shifting to a new paradigm for major transportation infrastructure investments. Across the nation, many states have established predictable and equitable frameworks for local value capture financing in state transportation projects. As we work toward that goal, Somerville and Cambridge will stand with the Commonwealth to advance the state of the art. We do so with the expectation that this is truly a new precedent for statewide policy, and that our communities will not be held to higher standards than other Massachusetts municipalities seeking state and federal financing for roadway, transit or other infrastructure projects.
Additional Comment from Massachusetts Area Planning Council:
“I want to congratulate the Cities of Cambridge and Somerville for making this unprecedented municipal commitment to help fund a critical state transportation project,” said Metropolitan Area Planning Council Executive Director Marc Draisen. “The Green Line Extension will have a significant, positive impact on our region in terms of jobs created and retained, new housing units created, and increased transit access for tens of thousands of residents. Cambridge and Somerville have shown a willingness to help invest in a project that will benefit themselves and their neighboring municipalities. We applaud them and MassDOT for working together to create this opportunity to advance this project.”
GLX Meeting Cancelled – Legislators Respond
State Legislators along the Green Line Extension corridor, sent a letter this afternoon to the Governor and MassDOT, protesting the cancellation of a public meeting scheduled for today in Medford. Click here to see letter
It’s clear that the city is unhappy with the scaling back of this project due to the exorbitant, inflated cost projections. But there is no logical reason for Somerville taxpayers to be on the hook for $50 million. How is the Mayor able to make this ‘donation’ to the Mass DOT without bringing it to the taxpayers in a referendum, or at the very least to the Board of Aldermen? How much is Tufts University contributing to the project? How much are developers (the big winners in this entire deal) going to be asked to contribute for each project they propose?
Wow. It took 13 paragraphs to say: “The state just extorted 50 million dollars from the residents of Somerville to build the GLX. This is the first time the state has done this to a municipality”
Looks like a big attempt to put a positive spin on what is otherwise a shameful precedent by the state government. I trust the state will now be sending bills to any other municipality that stands to benefit in any way from transportation related spending of the state. Kind of puts a whole new spin on the concept of public funding. A real genius, that Baker.
When I think about it though, it seems to fit the state’s decades-long pattern of weaseling out of funding of big ticket transportation needs (transferring debt to MBTA to help state budgets “balance”, avoiding maintenance costs, etc..)
The increase in the GLX project cost is mostly the result of state foot-dragging and mismanagement of the project. Somerville is essentially helping to pay the cost of the state’s medicine.
Charlie Baker should “put some skin in the game” and pay for the maintenance of every road he takes to get from his home (Swampscott?) to the State House in Boston.
This does not even say it will be built yet. By the time they drag their heels some more the costs will go up. Had this been designed properly to the money in place for the project it may have had an easier chance. It was clearly overdesigned which stalled it and possibly may end it. Mostly all we have here is a lot of talking almost saying nothing. I would find it difficult for the government to come up with more funds when they are so far in debt. But I suppose if it comes down to it they can print more money. If they push it on the taxpayers in Somerville it will force many of us just hanging on to exit. So I guess it’s wait and see how it plays out.
A. Moore, it’s not just over design the costs are inflated due to special interests that don’t benefit the community.
Maybe Matt. In my little experience I would have plans for the most basic design and then add in according to the order of priorities up to the agreed price. Then you need to use the formula to figure the extra cost by how many years it will take and the percentage for the type of work to estimate the total costs. Going in over cost with a blank check for added costs can be a deal breaker if there will be no more funds. This is a tough one as with this country so much in debt funds will be tough to get. Plus I don’t know how much Curtatone holding up the Wynn project which is holding up a lot of money coming in will somehow have an effect. You can be sure there are a lot of unhappy people over that which may or may not make a difference in this going forward.