We were looking forward to an open discussion from the School Committee on the issue of charter change. Instead we got comments like “my blood pressure is ready to burst,” no discussion of any merit and a resounding “Shut up!” from elected officials who should know better.

The resolution put forth was a gentle one encouraging elected officials to examine changes to a 108-year-old set of laws and regulations that mandates city government positions for a fence viewer, wood and bark measurer and grain weigher. And six of our ever so wise School Committee members shot it down in a burst of anger that seemed to have little relation to reality.

Why the hesitation to step back and examine our city’s political culture? Do we need to wait for scandal to take a sober look at how our local government works? If Mayor Joseph A. Curtatone’s administration is serious about charter review they will not only appoint a powerless task force but also support an effort to put the question on the ballot and authorize creation of a Charter Commission.

During an election, any city resident who has collected over 100 signatures can be a candidate for the commission. The nine who receive the most votes will be elected to it. With so many spots open, all the diverse voices in the city should be able to have a say and we will then be in a position to seriously scrutinize our political world. 

Between ten and eighteen months after its formation, the commission must put the proposed charter changes on the next municipal ballot. Adoption requires a majority vote. More than 100 Massachusetts communities have used this process to change their charters and we believe Somerville is ready to join them. Our blunt honesty is one of our better traits, and if we can use it to improve how our local government works why not?

Here’s hoping the School Committee can put political ambition aside and play a role in what should be an interesting and dynamic opportunity to improve our civic lives.